CINA — Outputs Showcase | All Deliverables, Figures, Reports

§1 Deliverables — 학술 페이퍼 + 장관급 브리핑 + 정량 검증

Track A (수업 제출 — 장관급 브리핑) + Track B (학술 투고 — 페이퍼) 듀얼 트랙 산출물 일체.

📄 Headline 산출물 (3)

Track B · Paper

📘 paper.md

3,428 words · 23 references · 7 sections + KO summary. Target venue: Global Environmental Change / NeurIPS CCAI 2026 / 한국정책학회보. Inline figure refs (1-6).

📐 EN + KO 📊 23 citations View on GitHub →

Track A · Briefing (KO)

🇰🇷 ministerial_briefing_ko.md

외교부 장관급 협상 전략 브리핑 (한국어). 9 섹션 + 4 부록(증거 추적성, 데이터 lineage, 불확실성, LLM provider attribution).

📐 9 sections 📎 4 appendices View on GitHub →

Track A · Briefing (EN)

🇬🇧 ministerial_briefing_en.md

English version of the ministerial briefing — 310 lines. Direct translation with same evidence-grounded structure for international circulation.

📐 310 lines 📐 mirror of KO View on GitHub →

🔬 정량 검증 보고서 (8)

Finding 1

🌍 IRR_Korea.md

IRR_Korea = 0.653, CI [0.55, 0.71]. 30/30 cells (5 NAP 섹터 × 6 GGA 이슈) Korean NAP × GGA crosswalk 적용.

IRR = 0.653 View →

Finding 2 ⭐

🇧🇷 IRR_Brazil.md

Brazil Translation Gap Δ = 0.304 CONFIRMED (Plano Clima 67% → GGA voluntary 48%). Putnam × Howlett gap 정량화 — NeurIPS CCAI signature finding.

Δ = 0.304 View →

Finding 3

📜 L25_formula_control_evidence.md

L.25 pre-crystallized formula 가설 — Tallberg 2010 procedural authority + Steinberg 2002 + Goh 2007 통합 검증.

NeurIPS CCAI 후보 View →

Finding 4

📊 realist_b0_statistics.md

Realist B0 F1 = 0.560, McNemar p<0.0001, κ=0.216. Constructivist + frame variables 경험적 정당성 확보.

F1 = 0.560 View →

Finding 5 ⭐

🌐 AILAC_norm_entrepreneur_quantification.md

AILAC norm entrepreneur 가설 — Finnemore-Sikkink (1998) 4 criteria 3.5/4 PASS. NES = 0.86. Tactical diplomatic framing 정량화.

NES = 0.86 View →

Phase 5 Final ⭐

📈 evaluation_report.md

Phase 5 4-task 정량 검증. Spearman ρ=0.658, P@3=R@3=1.00, Mean 4.53/5, α=0.905. Ablation A0-A5 + 5/5 PASS.

5/5 PASS View →

Crosswalk

📋 korean_nap_gga_crosswalk.csv

Korean National Adaptation Plan × GGA 5 NAP × 6 GGA = 30 cells. IRR_Korea 산출 기반.

30 cells View →

Pre-analytic

🎯 country_selection.md / sector_focus.md / agenda_matrix.md

Brazil 선정 근거 + Adaptation 섹터 정당성 + COP30 6-issue 매트릭스 (수업 과제 사전 분석).

3 docs Folder →

§2 Figures — Stage 2 시각화 (7 PNG · 300 dpi)

모든 figure는 data/processed/figures/ 또는 deliverables/에서 생성 — matplotlib + networkx, reproducible via src/stage2_graph/generate_figures.py.

Figure 1. Country × Issue Stance Heatmap

13 countries × 6 issues stance tensor (Stage 1 산출). 적색=opposing, 청색=supporting. 페이퍼 §3 anchor figure.

Figure 2. Procedural Authority Distribution

Tallberg 2010 framework: chair_role + pen_holder + drafts_text 신호 분포. Brazil COP30 chair authority 정량화.

Figure 3. Frame Consistency by Group

5-frame typology (scientific/justice/sovereignty/security/development) × 그룹별 빈도. AOSIS=justice, Saudi+India=sovereignty.

Figure 4. Centrality Rankings

5 centrality (PageRank·betweenness·eigenvector·degree·closeness) Top-K. Brazil 의장국 + EU 펜홀더 우위.

Country Similarity Network with Leiden Communities

Figure 5. Leiden Community Network

Leiden 2 communities: C0={Brazil, Multi, AGN, EU} development / C1={AOSIS, India, Korea, LMDC} mixed. Keohane-Victor 'horizontal cleavage' 정량 검증.

Figure 6. Hedging Density × Red Line 2D

AILAC (high hedging + mod RL — tactical), AOSIS (low hedging + high RL — principled), LDC (mod + low — vulnerable). Finnemore-Sikkink norm typology 시각 검증.

Figure 7. Hedging vs Red Line (보강판)

추가 그룹 라벨링 + 95% confidence ellipse 적용.

§3 Evaluations — Phase 5 4-Task + Ablation A0-A5

0.658

Task A · Spearman ρ ✅

0.42

Task B · ARI proxy ✅

1.00 / 1.00

Task C · P@3 / R@3 ⭐

4.53/5

Task D · Mean panel ✅

0.905

Task D · Krippendorff α ✅

5/5

Quality Gates PASS ⭐

🔍 Ablation Study (A0-A5)

Ablation	Removed	Spearman ρ Δ
A0 (full)	— (baseline)	0.658
A1	Bayesian CI	−0.05
A2	NATO 4-axis	−0.07
A3	Frame typology	−0.04
A4	Evidence grounding	−0.15
A5	Multi-LLM ensemble	−0.06

→ Evidence grounding (A4) is the single most load-bearing component — 페이퍼 §5.3 핵심 발견.

Phase 5 raw

📊 evaluation_report.json

raw 평가 데이터 (machine-readable). Task A/B/C/D + Ablation 전체 메트릭 + per-record breakdowns.

View JSON →

Pipeline

🐍 src/evaluation/run_full_evaluation.py

Phase 5 4-task 평가 재현 스크립트. python -m src.evaluation.run_full_evaluation으로 모든 메트릭 재생성.

View Code →

§4 Methodology Documents — 학술 방법론 (15 docs)

논문 §2-3 (이론·방법론)의 직접 구성 요소. docs/ 폴더 내 15개 markdown 일체.

Theory

01 Theoretical Foundations

Regime Complex (Keohane-Victor) · Two-Level Games (Putnam) · Issue Linkage (Tollison-Willett) · Epistemic Communities (Haas)

📦 모든 산출물 (Outputs Showcase)

§1 Deliverables — 학술 페이퍼 + 장관급 브리핑 + 정량 검증

📄 Headline 산출물 (3)

📘 paper.md

🇰🇷 ministerial_briefing_ko.md

🇬🇧 ministerial_briefing_en.md

🔬 정량 검증 보고서 (8)

🌍 IRR_Korea.md

🇧🇷 IRR_Brazil.md

📜 L25_formula_control_evidence.md

📊 realist_b0_statistics.md

🌐 AILAC_norm_entrepreneur_quantification.md

📈 evaluation_report.md

📋 korean_nap_gga_crosswalk.csv

🎯 country_selection.md / sector_focus.md / agenda_matrix.md

§2 Figures — Stage 2 시각화 (7 PNG · 300 dpi)

Figure 1. Country × Issue Stance Heatmap

Figure 2. Procedural Authority Distribution

Figure 3. Frame Consistency by Group

Figure 4. Centrality Rankings

Figure 5. Leiden Community Network

Figure 6. Hedging Density × Red Line 2D

Figure 7. Hedging vs Red Line (보강판)

§3 Evaluations — Phase 5 4-Task + Ablation A0-A5

🔍 Ablation Study (A0-A5)

📊 evaluation_report.json

🐍 src/evaluation/run_full_evaluation.py

§4 Methodology Documents — 학술 방법론 (15 docs)

01 Theoretical Foundations

02 Methodology

03 Data Architecture

04 Stage 1 Stance Extraction

05 Stage 2 Graph Analysis

06 Stage 3 Briefing Generation

07 Evaluation Protocol

08 Novelty Positioning

09 Ministerial Briefing Template

10 Council Protocol

11 Source Catalog

12 Data Collection Master Plan

13 Reference Tables

14 Schema v1.3 Changes

15 Stage 2 Features (Procedural Authority)

§5 Data Architecture — Manifest + Schema

📋 data/manifest/manifest.jsonl

📊 coverage_summary.json

🌐 docs/web/assets/data.json

§6 Code — Pipeline + Council + Evaluation

🚀 src/pipeline.py

🤖 src/stage1_extract/

🕸️ src/stage2_graph/

📝 src/stage3_brief/

📈 src/evaluation/

🏛️ src/council/

📥 src/collect/